Just wondering, but wouldn’t taking pictures of someone without permission be invasion of privacy? Like the paparazzi. But wouldn’t freedom of press/speech come into this too?
Comments:
Recent Posts
- How a Singapore Forwarder Company Bridges Time Zones Through Next-Level Air Logistics
- What You’re Really Paying For When Hiring a Singapore Events Photographer
- Material Matters When Choosing Your Outdoor Table
- Registering a Domain Name on a Budget: Tips and Tricks
- How to Stop Cyber Bullying: Tips for Parents to Monitor Kids’ Online Activity
- Essential Tips for Maximising Sea Freight in Singapore
- What to Consider When You Purchase Domain Name for Your Business
- Give Back to Your Community Through Corporate Giving
- How Can The Right Kindergarten Help Your Child
- Learning Helpful Skills at Parenting Singapore Workshops
- Why Your Company Should Be Considering Corporate Donations
- Montessori Singapore Proves That Not All Schools Are Boring
- You Will Love Dining Table Singapore Sale
- Reliable Forklift Is Necessary For Successful Business
- Montessori in Singapore Focuses On Helping Your Child
- Teens Just Love Our Cosplay Clothing
- Discover the Beauty of Your Child Learning Kids Ballet Singapore
- Become A Domain Name Seller To Make Money Online
- Having Baby Bump Deserves the Comfort of Maternity Dresses
- Shipping From Singapore to India Can Be Hassle Free Now
No it is not invasion of privacy. There is no expectation of privacy when out in public. And no freedom of the press and speech have nothing to do with this. They only stop the government not news media.