Just wondering, but wouldn’t taking pictures of someone without permission be invasion of privacy? Like the paparazzi. But wouldn’t freedom of press/speech come into this too?
Comments:
Suggested
- How does freedom of press make life better?
just some ideas, and what are some things that we can do in america that are simple things involving freedom of press but you cant do in other countries or you'll be punished. THANXXXXXXX soooo muc... - Critical Parts Of An Access Control System
An access control system is an innovation that helps in controlling the entrance to a certain building, facility, or any safe location. Companies and fitness industries of all sorts have actually incl... - Let Parcel Express Company Eliminate the Stress Over International Shipping
With all that our global parcel express solutions offer, you ought to know that we partnered up with and relied on by a selection of big firms. They are what makes it feasible for us to do so much for... - How You Can Benefit From A Warehouse Reach Truck
If you discover the best electrical reach vehicle offer for sale, you will swiftly discover that your workers fit while inside of it. They are developed to give the motorist lots of space and also a g... - Shipping From Singapore to India Can Be Hassle Free Now
The truth is, there is a firm that makes shipping from Singapore to India and also back much easier than ever before. They supply shipping immediately as well as choices for one-stop delivery is readi...
{ 1 comment }
No it is not invasion of privacy. There is no expectation of privacy when out in public. And no freedom of the press and speech have nothing to do with this. They only stop the government not news media.