Just wondering, but wouldn’t taking pictures of someone without permission be invasion of privacy? Like the paparazzi. But wouldn’t freedom of press/speech come into this too?
Comments:
Suggested
- What are the freedom of press rights for students & teachers?
Ok so I have this project due on wednesday and am having a little problem finding some of the rights for freedom of press. I covered the religious views of both of them anything else I missed? Please ... - What is the connection of Freedom of Press to the watergate scandal?
I am writing an essay and i have to include in one of my body paragraphs the importance of the freedom of press to the watergate scandal. if you could give me some pointers, facts, or anything else, t... - SEO Services in Singapore: Why Are They Important
If you look much deeper into the procedure of SEO, you will observe that it is such a facility as well as lengthy procedure that takes into consideration a number of altering formulas and also element... - Concealed Talents Are Revealed with Strengthsfinder Courses
The Gallup Strengthsfinder training courses are excellent for youngsters and adults that want to discover exactly what their toughest traits are. The youth programs are made for teenagers that are 15 ... - Make Your Home Yours with Beautiful Home Accessories in Singapore
When it involves home accessories Singapore, you have a lot of one-of-a-kind things to select from. There are lamps as well as various other lighting fixtures, the photos and also art work on your wal...
{ 1 comment }
No it is not invasion of privacy. There is no expectation of privacy when out in public. And no freedom of the press and speech have nothing to do with this. They only stop the government not news media.