Just wondering, but wouldn’t taking pictures of someone without permission be invasion of privacy? Like the paparazzi. But wouldn’t freedom of press/speech come into this too?
Comments:
Suggested
- Am I covered under freedom of press to post information of a musical event to the web?
If I am convering a public event at a venue, am able to post my coverage of the event with the location and the name of the venue that hosted it? Is this considered freedom of press? Comments:... - Charities In Singapore Creating a Great Place to Live
There are charities readily available that help family members develop a stronger bond by working out the problems that they could have within their home. There are charities that assist moms and dads... - A Forklift Rental Allows You To Find The Right One
Some tiny warehouses likewise consider what is frequently described as a variable reach forklift due to the fact that they have the capability to reach up to 56'. This makes it much easier for small s... - Commemorate Faith with the International 横浜教会 in Yokohama
A Baptist church is there to help the community in every way. It merely goes to confirm that the International Baptist church is there to offer and they go beyond academic requirements to training chi... - Coworking is the New as well as Improved Coworking Space Singapore
How would certainly you really feel about learning with others? There are courses offered that can teach you the best ways to take your creative thinking to a brand-new level in a coworking room Singa...
{ 1 comment }
No it is not invasion of privacy. There is no expectation of privacy when out in public. And no freedom of the press and speech have nothing to do with this. They only stop the government not news media.